Re: Prometheus Project (was Re: Which cryonics org?)

From: Forrest Bishop (forrestb@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Aug 15 1997 - 00:25:14 MDT


E. Shaun wrote:
>
>Forrest wrote:
>

>>Well, my decision
(Cryo storage)
 is based ..on.. , like the
>>people at Alcor, and feel they have a size advantage. The facility is
>>also not more than 3 hrs air time from Seattle or San Jose.

> From what I saw at the conference, the Prometheus Project looks
>pretty promising... When *I* sign
>up for cryonic suspension, I think that I will go with the Prometheus
>Project...it looks very stable (lots of funding) and Paul is a reputable
>physicist and businessman to boot.

Yes, it is a promising project, but is only a research program at present,
with no specific plans for actual storage. As one of the original PP pledegers,
($5000/yr, $2000 for pilot project) my motivation here is to help explore
alternatives to liquid nitrogen temperature storage and the associated
freezing damage. _If_ the research pans out I as well as others would switch
to that type of storage, assuming I'm not already suspended in LN2.
In the meantime, Alcor and the like are the only game in town.

Forrest



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:43 MST