From: Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 1997 - 23:44:00 MDT
Sean Morgan wrote:
>
> Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com>
> >[...] most of
> >the interpretations, from the Copenhagen Observer to Everett's many
> >worlds appear to be unprovable, and per our friend Ockham, not needed
> >either, save for our monkey brains which see thru monkey eyes.
>
> That is so common a misperception that it makes the many-worlds-faq
> http://kuoi.asui.uidaho.edu/~kamikaze/documents/many-worlds-faq.html
>
It all hinges on the term "complex", which, like "soul" and
"consciousness" is subject to a wide variety of interpretations. You
also didn't read what I actually said, which was that most of the QM
interpretations seem to be both unprovable and unneeded. Not just
Everett...
O---------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
O---------------------------------O
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:41 MST