From: Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Date: Fri Jul 25 1997 - 18:57:40 MDT
Hagbard Celine wrote:
> Okay, I'm no scientist. So the subjects that make you raise your
> eyebrows and smirk, are not necessarily the ones that elicit the same
> reaction from me. Given that no one is issued a list of taboo
> subject-matter when they join this list, such pseudo-science should be
> expected. Anyway, if it's as worthless as you think, don't bother
> responding. Let the thread die. If it doesn't die, then somebody wants
> to discuss it. "Extropian" is so damn broad that an argument for or
> against discussion of any topic is possible. If hard science as it
> applies to extropy is what some consider the most important facet of the
> extropian meme, maybe we need more than one list.
Thing is, nearly all of these topics are more than well discussed on the
net, and need not be discussed here.
O---------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
O---------------------------------O
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:40 MST