From: Carl Feynman (carlf@atg.com)
Date: Fri Jul 25 1997 - 07:49:54 MDT
At 10:15 PM 7/23/97 -0700, John K Clark wrote:
>Speech to text programs have gotten a lot better in the last few years but
>text to speech programs have not,...
>I'm no expert on either technology but it would seem to me that text to
>speech would be much easier than the other way round, yet less progress has
>been made, anybody know why?
Here's my theory: money. Whoever gets the first really good speech-to-text
product out there is going to make tons of money. Contrairiwise,
text-to-speech is clearly only going to make a few hundred kilos of money.
Hence, the smart money is investing in improving speech-to-text.
Some anecdotal evidence toward this point: I know three people who are
working on speech-to-text (and I know them by three different routes, so
it's not a circle of friends). I don't know *anyone* working on text-to-speech.
There may also be an element of 'the good is the enemy of the best': present
day text-to-speech is good enough to understand, so the motivation for
improving it is less than for speech-to-text, where present day tech is
still annoyingly inaccurate.
--CarlF
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:38 MST