From: Guru George (gurugeorge@sugarland.idiscover.co.uk)
Date: Mon Jul 21 1997 - 16:05:47 MDT
On Mon, 21 Jul 1997 11:18:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Anders Sandberg <nv91-asa@nada.kth.se> wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997, Guru George wrote:
>
>> Actually I would be *very* cautious about this. What worries me is this
>> : there's a lot of evidence to suggest that infants are a bundle of
>> expectations - possibilities waiting to be fulfilled by events in the
>> world.
>
>Hmm, exactly what evidence do you refer to here? You wording is
>rather fuzzy.
Lots of stuff I've picked up here and there- especially the physiologically
oriented research on myelinisation of the infant brain towards the end
of pregnancy being sufficient to mediate some emotional responses. Also
cognitive psychology as a whole, which suggests the general pattern that
the brain works that way (lock/key) - e.g. Dennet, Edelman. Also Oliver
Sacks' book on deaf people learning language (was it? - my memory is
really pretty crap, so I'm the wrong person to ask for precise details
about anything!)
>> Artificial wombs would have many positive benefits, for sure, but I
>> worry that infants raised in them might be mentally disturbed by the
>> lack of typical womb-like sounds and sensations, and also the responsiveness
>> and 'feedback' or 'communication' between mother and child in-womb (e.g.
>> infant shifts position, mother shifts position, stuff like that).
>
>That ought to be noticeable in the sheep that are brought up this way
>(it is very unlikely basal stuff like this would be restricted only
>to humans; mammals in general have some clever ways of ensuring the
>mother-child bond and emotional development). If it really is
>important with a more natural artificial womb the lambs ought to show
>averse emotional reactions when brought up.
Hmm - would we recognise what a disturbed lamb would be like? That sort
of thing requires a bit of the old *verstehen* I think, and I'm not so
confident that the kinds of researchers involved in these projects would
notice - not that they're bad of course (it's not their speciality), but
I would be more confident if they recognised the importance of the kind
of point I am making, and had (say) some cognitive psychologists or
maybe even psychotherapists along for the ride, looking out for just
this sort of problem. I do think it's extremely important to check this
out before we create a generation of psychos by accident or oversight.
>
>My personal main worry about the procedure (as shown in the brief
>film clip I saw) was that the womb was transparent and in a lighted
>room. I'm not certain, but this *could* affect the development of
>vision (both positively and negatively).
>
>We'll see when the data is published.
I hope so - as I say, I'm not that confident that the kind of scientist
involved in this kind of research is competent to notice the kind of
problems we're talking about.
Guru George
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:37 MST