Genetic Myopia

From: Rick Knight (rknight@platinum.com)
Date: Thu Jun 12 1997 - 11:04:19 MDT


     Lee Daniel Crosby wrote:
     
     "Evolution is a pretty simple mathematical phenomenon once you
     understand it. When applied to living organisms, it's quite
     clear that immortality serves no purpose to a gene's survival,
     and in fact is detrimental in many cases. Once you're done
     reproducing, your body is no longer useful to your genes' further
     replication, so no evolutionary pressure to continue is present.
     Evolution serves the replicators (genes, roughly speaking),
     not organisms."
     
     My response:
     
     "This somehow triggered a "what if" that I'd like to muddle thru. Is
     it possible that the torch-bearer for millions of years of physical
     evolution has been the gene. With the fairly recent advent of
     self-aware beings who have evolved consciously to a point of
     themselves creating the first near-sentient life forms (our computers,
     our eventual nanotechnological agents). Could the torch possibly be
     ready to pass from physical matter-bound immortality to a lighter
     energy form?
     
     We all fancy immortality or at least life extension with good quality
     of life but I don't even think it would take a century for an immortal
     to become quite weary of a matter-bound existence. Granted, if the
     majority were to become "immortal" in the physical sense, we'd likely
     get a lot more done, with no preoccupation on time constraints or
     energy spent fearing the limits of our own mortality.
     
     Fundamentally, I think we ultimately want freedom and retention of
     self-awareness, two things we perceive death robs us of. (Whether it
     does or not is answered individually for us post-mortem I suppose...if
     we care...if we're still there to care...).
     
     Living in the here and now, we can yammer on about quality of life,
     quests for the stars, soundness of financial investments, exploiting
     anything beneath us on the food/brain chain, yadda, yadda, yadda.
     It's all well and good, keeps the neurons firing and ideas
     percolating, passes the time and provides intrigue and distraction.
     
     But what if we as humans (or perhaps the posthuman motif of Extropian
     design) have the transcendent mechanism to shift immortality from
     physically-bound to an ethereal situation.
     
     Don't know about some of you but being fabulously wealthy in a chateau
     by the sea with plenty of servants and assured physical immortality
     doesn't hold a candle to the ability to experience the consciousness
     of an eagle over the mountains, a wave cresting, a thunderhead
     culminating, a whale breaching, a redwood capturing a spring breeze, .
      I could actually see spending even a fraction of eternity (lets say a
     thousand millennia) instilling my matter-emancipated consciousness
     into other physical manifestations and assimilating the "knowing" of
     the experience into my being(acquiring experience, BTW, is what I've
     assigned to be the meaning of life). Experience is the ultimate
     upload. Matter-bound existence seriously limits the quality and
     quantity of experience gathering I suspect.
     
     So what of it? Care to engage in a discussion as to whether genes
     will have soon served their usefulness and will give way to higher
     forms of communicating essence and design to (for the next several
     billion years) a blooming and fertile universe?
     
     
     Regards,
     
     
     
     Rick Knight
     



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:29 MST