From: Anton Sherwood (dasher@netcom.com)
Date: Sat Jun 07 1997 - 21:23:25 MDT
quoth David Laws
: An idea must be expressed and debated before it can be finally classed
: 'stupid'. A 'doctor' in the 18th century would have considered the idea of
: NOT bleeding an ailing individual 'stupid'.
Fine. Is it okay if I make an initial estimate of an idea's stupidity,
and concentrate on the least-stupid-appearing first, or do you insist that
all ideas get equal attention until PROVEN stupid?
Anton Sherwood *\\* +1 415 267 0685 *\\* DASher@netcom.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:28 MST