From: Guru George (gurugeorge@sugarland.idiscover.co.uk)
Date: Sun Apr 13 1997 - 19:39:22 MDT
On Sun, 13 Apr 1997 23:14:19 +0200
"ard" <rbrown@smb.sams.ch> wrote:
>> Yes, of course there are games without winners or losers, but there are
>> games with winners and losers too, and those are quite legitimate as
>> games too. My point is that there is nothing intrinsically spiritually
>dodgy
>> about winning/losing scenarios.
>>
>
> Good, because in this game you have just lost!
>
> Why bring up the legitimatcy of finite games?
>
> Who cares about spiritual dodginess?
>
> How did you react after reading the first sentence?
>
> What does that reaction tell you about yourself?
>
Excuse me, before we go any further, can I just make a reality check: do
you have a point or are you just rambling? (I've been under the
impression that you were making a point; it's ok if you're rambling, but
that would require a different kind of response. Also, do you think
it's possible that you might be being a wee bit pretentious?)
Guru George
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:22 MST