Re: "Official" Extropian Concepts

From: RUDIHOFFMA@aol.com
Date: Sat Mar 08 1997 - 20:41:39 MST


In a message dated 97-03-04 10:56:11 EST, you write:

<< Subj: Re: "Official" Extropian Concepts
 Date: 97-03-04 10:56:11 EST
 From: RavnStCrow@aol.com
 Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
 Reply-to: extropians@extropy.org
 To: extropians@extropy.org
 
 In a message dated 97-03-04 07:23:22 EST, you write:
 
 <<
  Thanks for question/observation (?). No, I would not say that I am
  "officially" anything!:)
  I certainly would not want a lot of wonderful and skeptical people who do
 not
  happen to share my views on cryonic suspension or religion to think they
are
  "Outside" of extropian ideas. Or will be kicked out of the party! :)>>
 
 Great response! ; )
 
 
  
 <<I like the orientation that Extropy has in a number of areas. Including
 the
  pretty clear cut fact, IMHO, that most progress we as a race have made has
  been a result of increasing technology. Not new versions of old
  superstitions called religions.>>
 
  
  Which does not mean there are not some wonderful, kind, thoughtful people
  deeply involved in all sorts of religions. I just happen to believe that
  they would be "good" people anyway. They are basically decent, in other
  words, *despite* their particular brand of superstition, not *because* of
 it.
>>
 (snip)
 
Dear RavnStCrow (Nadia)

Hello! From Rudi Hoffman (RUDIHOFFMA@aol.com)

You write,

< I agree, but the sad fact is, most people think that we are sort of
incapable
 of rational actions, never mind being good... I have watched grown men sit
 and say that the only reason we don't commit mayhem on a regular basis is
 because we have something to fear ( God's wrath ) and/or that we have been
 ordered from on high, by a devine source...>

Part of the whole libertarian/ athiest/ extropian orientation, and a rather
foundational part, IMHO, is the concept that people *are* basically "good".
 Of course, there is quotes around "good" to acknowledge that this is a
rather ill-defined overused "line-drawing" word, but I think most of us have
a reasonable idea of what is meant by "good" here.

It is interesting to me that the authoritarian approach to life, which I
would define as the opposite of libertarian/ athiest/ extropian assumes
people are basically "evil".

Or at least, if we are left to our own devices, that our basic "evil nature"
will out. The authoritarians therefore decide their infinite wisdom to
proclaim from "on high" what we may or may not do, think, or say.

Perhaps there is a time for such a "revealed truth" type of orientation, when
we are not dealing with educated and knowledgeble adults.

But for the FDA to tell me as a knowledgeable adult that I may not use a drug
or procedure that may save or improve my life, for example, is RIDICULOUS!

Do you remember a few years back our "friends and protectors" at the FDA were
trying to pass regulations that would require prescriptions for megadose
vitamins and herbs?

Outrageous! Fortunately, this was such clear cut violation of good sense and
good science that it did not happen, but equivalently "off the wall"
interventionists tactics are threatened by "do-gooders" continually.

"Thank God for athiests and freethinkers!" :)
 
 <Anyway, thanks for responding in an intelligent way to my joking about
 definitions, there has been some attempts lately to "redefine" extropy... in
 sometimes bizarre ways...>

There is a listing somewhere written by Max More (I think) of some extropian
principals. It is outstanding! If anyone reading knows where this may be
posted on some board or other, please let me/ us know.
 
< Not that your statement was bizarre in any way- your 4 things, atheist,
  skeptic, cryonics ( life extension) and Libertarianism, are pretty much
 Extropic staples, I guess...>
  
 Nadia
 <"On with the Automorph">

I am intrigued with this. What does it mean?

Warmly,

Rudi
 
 
 
 ----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
 From postmaster@maxwell.lucifer.com Tue Mar 4 10:55:52 1997
 Return-Path: postmaster@maxwell.lucifer.com
 Received: from maxwell.lucifer.com ([207.167.210.100]) by
emin06.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA13141; Tue, 4 Mar 1997
10:55:43 -0500
 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
IAA32291 for extropians-outgoing; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 08:54:07 -0700
 X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.lucifer.com: majordom set sender to
postmaster using -f
 From: RavnStCrow@aol.com
 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 10:54:00 -0500 (EST)
 Message-ID: <970304105358_685930873@emout04.mail.aol.com>
 To: extropians@extropy.org
 Subject: Re: "Official" Extropian Concepts
 Sender: postmaster@extropy.org
 Precedence: bulk
 Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:14 MST