From: Enigl@aol.com
Date: Thu Mar 06 1997 - 22:11:42 MST
In a message dated 97-03-05 13:26:52 EST, you write:
<< >The existence of risk-group-specific AIDS-defining diseases in the
absence
>of HIV challenges your assertion. >>
Not at all. It just means HIV is one but probably not the only. Look at
HTLV -1 and HTLV-2 and probably some CMV, etc. The definition of AIDS is not
satisfied by the non-HIV infected people since the CD4+ at <= 0.3 and
declining is not their. The skeptics add every non-AIDS disease up from
"0.0" to CD4+ 1.0 that should not be in the AIDS group at all.
Davin C. Enigl, (Sole Proprietorship) MEAS
President-Microbiologist
Microbiology Consulting, Hazard Analysis and
Critical Control Points (HACCP), CGMP, and Validations
for the Food, Cosmetic, Nutritional Supplement, and Pharmaceutical Industry
enigl@aol.com
http://members.aol.com/enigl/index.html
March 6, 1997
8:11 pm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:14 MST