From: RavnStCrow@aol.com
Date: Thu Mar 06 1997 - 15:16:38 MST
In a message dated 97-03-06 16:02:39 EST, you write:
<<
> I wonder if the "individualist" (a well balanced, worldly individual who
can
> be in many situations) can be seen by others and not misunderstood.
Nope. Not a chance. If they understood, they would be one also.
>>
This is not quite the response I had hoped for, in other words, it's an "us
against them" scenario. In assuming that I meant "others" was some kind of
collective, did you not miss a fundamental issue, which is individuality
itself as a given?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:14 MST