Re: INFO: Copyrights (was Hypertext)

From: Ken Meyering (ken@define.com)
Date: Wed Mar 05 1997 - 17:00:02 MST


Hal Finney wrote:

> I agree that for some purposes, like official documents, contracts, and
> the like, a method is needed to hold them stably. But for hypertext
> publishing and debate, it seems counterproductive to try to keep people
> from revising their work.

I imagine a fully evolved hypertext system replacing the court system.

It's really bogus when the judge says "the jury will disregard the last
statements."

This applies to hypertext, too.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:14 MST