From: Natasha V. More(f/k/a/Nancie Clark) (flexeon@primenet.com)
Date: Thu Jan 09 1997 - 08:58:57 MST
At 01:28 AM 1/9/97 -0500, QueeneMUSE@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 97-01-08 21:00:43 EST, you write:
>
><< If we hung imagination on a wall with one of those, one of those, you
>know,
> "things" that we used to use to hang artefacts on walls, (oh what are they
> called.)
>
> You know, those things that hold up the cardboard or similar material placed
> around a picture to serve as contract, along with that outer structure made
> up of parts fitted and joined together at the 90 degree corners, along with
> a piece of glass or plexiglas that is inserted on top and fitted just so to
> protect the artefact and ensure that it would hang just - perfectly.
>
> Anyway ... one of those things that you could hammer into the wall to hang
> the artefact ... But, how could we make sure that it stayed there. I mean,
> right there where we hung it? What if it wandered off?
> >>
>
>if we hung the imagination, what would we hang it by? It's neck? It's
>toenails?
We would have to hang it by the very cells in the brain that provoke the
firing of creativity impulses and imagination responses. It might get a
little small, so we'd have to use nano-frames.
Natasha Vita More
[f/k/a Nancie Clark]
http://www.primenet.com/~flexeon
Extropic Art Movement/Transhumanist Art Site
* * * * * * * * * *
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:43:59 MST