Re: Smart Sex (was:Healthy Sexuality)

From: Michael Lorrey (retroman@tpk.net)
Date: Fri Dec 20 1996 - 19:45:36 MST


The Low Willow wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 3:32pm, QueeneMUSE@aol.com wrote:
>
> } to be an issue as we evolve through other means, yet I am surprised that it
> } seems the more techno- evloved most men are, and advanced intellectually,
> } often the more neanderthal and outdated the belief systems about sex...
>
> Part of this is probably crypto-monasticism absorbed from society, but I
> think there are justifications for distancing myself from my sex drive.
> For one thing, it _is_ a drive.

Hmmmmmmmmmm. A drive, huh. Lets see. BUild a spherical spaceship, say,
on the back side of the moon. Can't have any female technicians. Grow a
skin on it that has the same high density of nerve tissue found in the
male genitalia. If you turn off the nerves on one side, the ship will be
attracted to the half of the females in the universe on the other side
of the ship (actually all of them since the universe is a loop). Since
the number of females in the universe is basically almost infinite, one
would generate a HUGE amount of thrust, though probably limited by an
inverse squared rule, but you could quickly reach near light speeds,
achieving time dilation of like 1%, so you could travel hundreds, even
thousands of light years in very little time.
TANSTAAFL!!!

                        Michael Lorrey
---------------------------------------------------------
President retroman@tpk.net
Northstar Technologies Agent Lorrey@ThePentagon.com
Inventor of the Lorrey Drive Silo_1013@ThePentagon.com
http://www.tpk.net/~retroman/
---------------------------------------------------------
Inventor, Webmaster, Ski Guide, Entrepreneur, Artist,
Outdoorsman, Libertarian, Certified Genius.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:54 MST