Can we develop a better definition of extropy?

From: Romana Machado (romana@glamazon.com)
Date: Mon Dec 16 1996 - 15:39:02 MST

• Next message: I William Wiser: "Healthy Sexuality"
• Previous message: Kathryn Aegis: "Re: Constructed gender differences (was: Re: guidelines/ethics)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

 T0Morrow@aol.com writes
>Certainly, the word merits scrutiny, and its definition may benefit from
>refinement. But I expect that we will have quatifiable and objective
>measures of "extropy" no soon than we do of "beauty" and "virtue". (The
>observation by no means denigrates the utility of these words, of course.)
>

Certainly. By "better", in this case, I mainly mean "more easily and
clearly communicable". (I only took the "measure" tack because it was
there, in the definition before me at the time.)

Romana Machado romana@glamazon.com
erotic site: http://www.glamazon.com/ "Romana Machado's Peek of the Week"
personal site: http://www.fqa.com/romana/ "Romana Machado World Headquarters"

• Next message: I William Wiser: "Healthy Sexuality"
• Previous message: Kathryn Aegis: "Re: Constructed gender differences (was: Re: guidelines/ethics)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:53 MST