Re: Nanotechnology Progress

From: Dr. Rich Artym (rartym@galacta.demon.co.uk)
Date: Fri Nov 15 1996 - 20:13:15 MST

Next message: Max M: "Re: the robot scenario"
Previous message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Extropian Optimism"
Maybe in reply to: John K Clark: "Nanotechnology Progress"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In message <Pine.SOL.3.91.961111182829.29363d-10000...>, Eugene Leitl writes:

> 3) Life? Which life? Life's solid-state. This surface is contaminated by
> primitive life precursors. Ablate the atmosphere by antiparticle beam,
> we will need the vacuum for disassembly. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFt. Operation
> completed, cooldown countdown started. Units 43.4534.3345.745
> to 55.353.455.454 state 433.43 ready for spindown. Standby.

Oops, wrong planet ... :-)

Rich.

-- 
###########  Dr. Rich Artym  ================  PGP public key available
# galacta #  Email   : rich@galacta.demon.co.uk         158.152.156.137
# ->demon #  Web     : http://www.galacta.demon.co.uk   194.222.245.150
# ->ampr  #  AMPR    : rich@g7exm[.uk].ampr.org 44.131.164.1 BBS:GB7MSW
# ->NTS   #  Fun     : Unix, X, TCP/IP, kernel, O-O, C++, SoftEng, Nano
###########  More fun: Regional IP Coordinator Hertfordshire + N.London

Next message: Max M: "Re: the robot scenario"
Previous message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Extropian Optimism"
Maybe in reply to: John K Clark: "Nanotechnology Progress"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:50 MST