From: Anders Sandberg (nv91-asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Fri Nov 01 1996 - 15:52:38 MST
On Fri, 1 Nov 1996, Chris Hind wrote:
> >> Of course, we don't consider multiple personalities to be a "disorder".
> >> That's just the way things are for us. If our internal organization
> >> interfered with our goals, then it could be considered a "disorder"
> >
> >A very good definition. I usually define something as "disease" or
> >"unhealth" if it limits the victim's possibilities - if it instead
> >enhances them it is good.
>
> But true mp disorder results from a childhood trauma so the disorder isn't
> particularly normal.
No, and it is usually linked to other personality problems. "Normal" MPS
is hardly anything I would want; I prefer the transhuman version
(MPE, Multiple Personality Enhancement?).
For a fictional treatment of MPE, see Walter John William's _Aristoi_,
where practically all people have AI-supported independent
subpersonalities doing multitask work.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension!
nv91-asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~nv91-asa/main.html
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:49 MST