From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Date: Mon Sep 23 1996 - 01:08:00 MDT
At 12:13 AM 9/23/96 -0600, Ira Brodsky wrote:
>Please reread the original post and my reaction. I never said "a missile
>could never have hit TWA flight 800." I was responding to the specific
>claim that Flight 800 was shot down by a *US Navy missil* and that there
>is a *massive cover up* underway extending all the way up to the President.
IAN: Based on the 100+ witness and radar reports, someone shot the
plane down with a missile. They must have used a fairly large and
powerful missile requiring a fairly large ocean vessel to launch it.
How does the suggestion that the Navy may have fired this missile in
any way seem equivalent to "anti-gravity experiments"? The suggestion
that there is such an equivalence, seems to me to be the only thing
resembling an "anti-gravity experiment."
Adding to the missile reports the fact that early reports said the
Navy was conducting maneuvers near the crash, on what factual or logical
basis have you totally junked the Navy missile theory ? I'd like to know,
so that I too can discard this theory as you have. I've not seen any
rational basis stated by the FBI regarding their dismissal of this.
***********************************************************************
IAN GODDARD <igoddard@erols.com> Q U E S T I O N A U T H O R I T Y
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
visit Ian Goddard's Universe -----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
_______________________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:35:45 MST