From: Max M (maxmcorp@worldonline.dk)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 13:55:37 MST
gts wrote:
> I think we need only look around us to see the evidence that genetics
> must play a major role in determining our morality. It's quite obvious
> that we tend first to identify with and help our closest of kin. After
> their needs are met we then begin to hear the much less strident
> evolutionary voice that urges us to help other less closely related
> humans.
I don't doubt that genetics defines a lot of our behaviours and
psychological makeup. But this does not mean that we should just act on
impulse.
Our ethics should not be based on genetics.
To make an extreme point: "If forced pregnancy and rape is a good way to
spread my genes, would it then not be god morale to rape and impregnate
as many as possible?"
Obviously not!
So it is not as simple as to say that if we have a genetic advantage in
doing something, it makes for a sound set of ethics.
regards Max M Rasmussen, Denmark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:17 MST