RE: duck me!

From: Rafal Smigrodzki (rms2g@virginia.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 01 2002 - 11:46:43 MST

• Next message: Eugen Leitl: "Re: duck me!"
• Previous message: Hal Finney: "Reverse postmodernism hoax"
• In reply to: gts: "Re: duck me!"
• Next in thread: Lee Corbin: "Objectivity Again (was RE: duck me!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

gts wrote:

> That would be a relevant argument if I were being absolutist about
> some empirical hypothesis. But I am not being absolutist about any
> empirical hypothesis. I am being a rationalist.

### You are an absolutist about a matter of taste.

Rafal

• Next message: Eugen Leitl: "Re: duck me!"
• Previous message: Hal Finney: "Reverse postmodernism hoax"
• In reply to: gts: "Re: duck me!"
• Next in thread: Lee Corbin: "Objectivity Again (was RE: duck me!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:17:55 MST