From: louisnews Newstrom (louisnews@comcast.net)
Date: Wed Sep 18 2002 - 10:34:00 MDT
From: Lee Corbin <lcorbin@tsoft.com>
> Would anyone
> regardless of their political views please support Harvey
> on this if it is true that I have ignored your objections
> and continue to misstate your position?
I was all set to do just that, but then I read further...
> You, and your brother, and perhaps Michael Wiik have called me
> dishonest.
I guess I don't have to answer. You already remember that I have
called you dishonest.
> I would invite anyone else, provided they have an
> example, to also make that claim. If I *am* being dishonest,
> then I really want to know.
Um... Is three not enough? Is there a quorum amount that will convince
you the we know you are dishonets? Perhaps every single poster on the
list? How many people have to say it before you quit asking for more?
Actually, I think the key here is "provided they have an example". You
don't need people to tell you that you are dishonest. You just want to
dig up the old arguments again.
I hope everyone tells you are dishonest, and I hope they all refrain
from playing the game of reposting your crap.
--- Louis Newstrom louisnews@comcast.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:17:08 MST