From: Extropian Agro Forestry Ventures Inc. (megao@sk.sympatico.ca)
Date: Wed Sep 11 2002 - 10:15:47 MDT
The trick is to make the device rugged, tamper-proof, able to communicate via
many modes, programmed to store information so that like the nixon tapes the
blank spots don't interfere with fidelity.
If the market is worldwide and like macdonalds "Billions and Biollions are
served" there should be no problem to "Make it so" and iron out the bugs.
If the will to make this work is there the ways and means will be found!!!!!
The issue is that too much human resource is being deployed for security. Like
military technology, it has spin-offs ... but at what giant cost?
Chuck Kuecker wrote:
> If anyone who wants to can opt out - what good is the implant? A mandatory
> implant could be burned out by a brief pulse of RF, or the implant site
> could be shielded to prevent downloads.
>
> I also see a market for chips stolen from their rightful wearers, and used
> in crimes...
>
> Chuck Kuecker
>
> At 09:31 09/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >Rather than cameras everywhere try universal GPS implants that download
> >tracking info periodically. The system then compares location of individual
> >to location and time of crime and bingo.
> >The issue of manditory constant exposure to RF from the devices is there.
> >We currently endure passively quite a bath of RF/EMF but that does not make
> >it
> >a given if we choose to opt out. ei- wear a suit desgned to
> >capture/redirect/shield
> >RF/EMF.
> >
> >Draconian as it sounds, this would be simple, cheap and effective.
> >
> >MJ
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:57 MST