From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Sun Sep 08 2002 - 08:05:32 MDT
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, louisnews Newstrom wrote:
> I judge "not". See http://heritage.stsci.edu/2002/21/supplemental.html.
Actually, the URL of more interest is:
http://heritage.stsci.edu/2002/21/lucas.html
It may indicate that the Hoag galaxy is not so unusual after all.
It does provide a distance to the object -- 600 million l.y.
I personally would not launch replicators across that distance
given that there are much nearer fish to fry.
> It is NOT unusual to see galaxies laid out in this manner. In fact, the
> picture of Hoag's Object you gave us has a second such galaxy.
Good point -- raises the issue of whether multiple entities
engineer their galaxies in this general direction.
> The only unusual part about Hoag's Object is that the cause of this
> formation is not known. Other galaxies laid out in this manner can be
> explained by nearby phenomenon.
Of course any intelligence would want to take advantage of
local resources. Would engineered galactic collisions be
a reasonable strategy?
> With many examples of this kind of galaxy, seeing one with no visible
> cause does not make me leap to the conclusion of engineering.
No, of course not -- but does it lead you to want to investigate
the galaxy further?
Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:50 MST