Re: Fw: Proles without a clue???

From: Alex Ramonsky (alex@ramonsky.com)
Date: Fri Jun 14 2002 - 03:43:53 MDT


E. Shaun Russell wrote:

> Alex Ramonsky wrote:
>
>> Rich fat westerners with blisters on their asses have not the scars
>> of those who've lived the other way; scars physical, mental and
>> emotional.
>> Now you know why I'm such a bad-tempered, paranoid old fart. : )
>> Ramonsky
>
>
> I might concede you the point that many (by no means all) Westerners
> have had it easy compared to other countries, but without sounding
> overly rude, I have to ask: "so what?" I will agree that I am
> fortunate to live in North America, and I don't really take it for
> granted; I may complain occasionally about Canadian politics, but
> faced with the option of having to live in Tunisia or Uganda, I
> certainly prefer my relatively "rich" and "fat" Western life.

Yep, totally agree. So do I. I never intended to imply that anybody
should feel guilty about anything; I only intended to point out there's
no sense in anyone claiming there isn't a massive gap between 'haves'
and 'have-nots'. There is. I was trying to define that gap more clearly.
(Most people seemed to think that the 'poor' are people who can't afford
televisions etc. I found that a bit short-sighted).
Ramonsky

PS You know this 'eight posts a day' thing? If I do eight posts on
sunday in LA and get on a plane to the UK, when I get there it's Monday
(although still sunday in LA) -do I get another 8 posts? Tee hee.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:14:47 MST