From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 12:37:42 MDT
At 11:34 AM 5/27/02 -0400, Mike Lorry wrote:
>Excellent. The problem is that little or nothing you describe is being
>done. ExI, Pro-Act, and this list are conspicuously anti-action,
>anti-initiative, with many claiming that any action of any kind, to any
>degree, ...
Mike, let's take a look at your second sentence for a moment. You blurt
out a statement that you do not have enough information about to validate.
I am annoyed at your comment that Pro-Act is "anti-action ...". This is
unnecessary and emotional bias on your part and, while I can certainly
rationalize why you would say this, it is non-progressive. What is also
non-progressive is your incessant need to reduce arguments to your personal
bias of "libertarian." You loose my interest when you do this because my
political philosophy is beyond dated political models derived from various
protocols and without having to rely on one statutory brand.
You have no idea what is occurring with Pro-Act and until I reveal the next
stages of Pro-Act, they will remain private. My personal goal is to get
the most advantage and exposure for Pro-Act ideas. How I do this is my own
decision, along with my partners, and until this is laid out for public
comment, I will keep it close to the chest.
Natasha
Natasha Vita-More
Founder, Transhumanist Arts & Culture
Executive Art Director, Digital Design
http://www.natasha.cc http://www.extropic-art.com http://www.transhuman.org
"I'd rather be inebriated on a classic life than a 1996 classic Merlot."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:14:25 MST