From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 20:15:06 MDT
At 04:08 PM 4/22/02 -0700, Jeff Davis sent us to:
>http://www.balkanunity.org/mideast/english/zionism/ch04.htm
Well, it might be of interest that this piece (copiously footnoted though
it is) derives from a site where we also learn such amazing truths as:
http://www.balkanunity.org/usa/english/sept11.htm
>Those who watched the news from the beginning, must also have
>noticed that initially there were only two planes mentioned:
>the one that hit the first tower, and the one that hit the
>Pentagon. Then we learned that the Pentagon plane was the THIRD
>one, not the second.
>We were also shown footage of the plane collapsing with the WTC
>tower – only the footage was not very realistic. Although the
>tower and the explosion were probably real, the plane itself
>was obviously an animation. The second WTC collision supposedly
>happened 15-20 minutes after the first one, and TV crews had
>all the time to rush to the scene, take positions and wait
>for the replay. They could not have helped noticing the
>second airplane approaching, at low altitude and low speed.
>Why aren’t we shown the real footage?
>The day after the attack, we were shown on Greek TV footage
>of eyewitnesses being interviewed about the attacks. They were
>almost unanimous in asserting (a couple of them very emphatically),
>that there were NO airplanes. Although this footage was not aired
>again, we were able to notice on subsequent days that eyewitnesses
>spoke about EXPLOSIONS, not AIRPLANES.
Uh-huh.
Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:37 MST