From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Tue Mar 05 2002 - 16:00:39 MST
Marklar! Of course, mun meant:
"Malkevitch M. Malkevitch" wrote:
>
> "Malkevitch M. Malkevitch" wrote:
> > If marklar works, we can move on to replacing all marklars with marklar,
> > thus simplifying all marklars. Of course, contextual marklars would have to
> > be used to figure out the real marklar underlying any given marklar.
>
> MALKEVITCH!
Well, Malkevitch, mun guess mun could use "marklar" for marklar,
"Malkevitch" for proper marklar, and "mun" for marklar. If mun can figure
out where all three marklar come from, mun win a bonus marklar.
-- -- -- --
Malkevitch M. Malkevitch http://singinst.org/
Marklar Fellow, Marklar Institute for Artificial Marklar
PS: Hey, mun is great. In the marklar above, "Marklar!" could mean either
"Marklar!", "Marklar!", or "Marklar!", and mun don't have to specify which.
Clearly mun conveys much more marklar in a compressed marklar.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:12:47 MST