nanotech and self-replication discussion

From: jeff davis (jrd1415@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Dec 17 2001 - 15:17:35 MST

• Next message: Kai Becker: "Re: some U.S. observations and notes"
• Previous message: John Clark: "Re: some U.S. observations and notes"
• Next in thread: Spike Jones: "its miller tiiiime"
• Reply: Spike Jones: "its miller tiiiime"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Friends,

You may recall that the Sept issue of Scientific
American was dedicated to Nanotechnology, and featured
articles by Smalley and Whitesides asserting the
infeasibility of Drexlertech (MNT).

The boys and girls at Foresight have now published
their responses to these articles, and they can be
found at:

Index page:

http://crit.org/http://imm.org/SciAmDebate2/index.html

(Response to Whitesides article:)

http://crit.org/http://imm.org/SciAmDebate2/whitesides.html
 
and (Response to Smalley article:)

http://crit.org/http://imm.org/SciAmDebate2/smalley.html

Pleasant reading. Very high signal to noise ratio
(IMO, YMMV).

Best, Jeff Davis

     "Everything's hard till you know how to do it."
                         Ray Charles

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com

• Next message: Kai Becker: "Re: some U.S. observations and notes"
• Previous message: John Clark: "Re: some U.S. observations and notes"
• Next in thread: Spike Jones: "its miller tiiiime"
• Reply: Spike Jones: "its miller tiiiime"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:37 MST