From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sat Dec 15 2001 - 20:01:56 MST
At 06:35 PM 12/15/01 -0800, Reason wrote:
>>From where I'm standing, religiosity looks like playing by someone else's
>rules & spirituality is making your own rules.
Weird, man. I started out writing this:
.............................
I would suggest that people cease misusing the word `religiosity' as if it
were a simple synonym for `religious faith' or `religiousness'.
`Religiosity' is a word with a specific denigratory meaning: it denotes
phoney piety, the pretense of devotion, etc.
...........................
Then I checked my Oxford dictionary, and bugger me it sez:
religiosity n. Being religious or religiose.
religiose a. Excessively religious.
Hmm. *Excessive* is an interesting modifier in this context. If there
really *were* a God Whose Divine Purpose for humans includes our abject
surrender and worship of the Godhead, then could one be *too* religious? I
detect an implied acknowledgement that extreme religious devotion often
masks neurosis or humbug.
So I'd still hope that people go easy on the word, which seems to contain
too easy a slur built into it.
Damien Broderick
[not a religious bone in my ruthlessly de-programmed body]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:34 MST