Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not wo...

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Wed Dec 12 2001 - 09:28:24 MST

• Next message: Mike Lorrey: "Re: photochemical advance"
• Previous message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re:[...] 'Casteding"
• Next in thread: Mike Lorrey: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not wo..."
• Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not wo..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Eugene Leitl spaketh:

<<<On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:

> > That's because you're a dumb, cocksucking pigfucker.
>
> Now there's an example of a perfectly relevant, useful,
> expressive ad hominem. Well done.>>>

>>Instant argument, just add hominem!

(Of course, the proper endearment form is "you big, dumb dogshit-eating
hillbilly"). >>

Now that is so archaic, hillbilly. The proper term is hilljack. Please
refrain, in the future, from being so 90's. :)~

• Next message: Mike Lorrey: "Re: photochemical advance"
• Previous message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re:[...] 'Casteding"
• Next in thread: Mike Lorrey: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not wo..."
• Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: META: what is verbal abuse, anyway? (Caution: foul languageahead/ not wo..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:28 MST