Re: Dat Ol' Debbil Sun

From: Curious (curious@hyperreal.pl)
Date: Tue Nov 20 2001 - 20:58:38 MST

• Next message: John Clark: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
• Previous message: Curious: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
• In reply to: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Dat Ol' Debbil Sun"
• Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Re: Dat Ol' Debbil Sun"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

www.hyperreal.pl/curious/looser.mp3

> OK, here is why my interpretation of Bond's research contradicts the
latest

• Next message: John Clark: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
• Previous message: Curious: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
• In reply to: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Dat Ol' Debbil Sun"
• Next in thread: Damien Broderick: "Re: Dat Ol' Debbil Sun"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:04 MST