Hey, I don't want it to be true, either

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Thu Nov 08 2001 - 03:01:44 MST

• Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: prying open the "Rogue Males" article"
• Previous message: Mitchell Porter: "Anticipatory backfire"
• Next in thread: Mark Walker: "Re: Hey, I don't want it to be true, either"
• Reply: Mark Walker: "Re: Hey, I don't want it to be true, either"
• Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Hey, I don't want it to be true, either"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991532

`Bizarre chemical discovery gives homeopathic hint.'

you don't really expect me to sign my name to this...? :)

• Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: prying open the "Rogue Males" article"
• Previous message: Mitchell Porter: "Anticipatory backfire"
• Next in thread: Mark Walker: "Re: Hey, I don't want it to be true, either"
• Reply: Mark Walker: "Re: Hey, I don't want it to be true, either"
• Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Hey, I don't want it to be true, either"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:11:51 MST