Re: rantionality with a little "n"

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2001 - 20:29:13 MST

• Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Hal Finney's optimal-production argument"
• Previous message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: "Epicycles": How Islam Won, and Lost, the Lead in Science"
• In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: rationality with a little "r""
• Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: rantionality with a little "n""
• Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: rantionality with a little "n""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 11:09 PM 10/29/01 -0800, samantha wrote:

>Too often "rantionality" becomes a club to
>bludgeon

What a splendid and useful typo!

Damien Broderick

• Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Hal Finney's optimal-production argument"
• Previous message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: "Epicycles": How Islam Won, and Lost, the Lead in Science"
• In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: rationality with a little "r""
• Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: rantionality with a little "n""
• Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: rantionality with a little "n""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:11:44 MST