Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem

From: Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Sat Sep 29 2001 - 01:46:38 MDT

Next message: Sean Kenny: "RE: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thought problem"
Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: 1e6 advantage to the terrorists"
In reply to: Damien Broderick: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thought problem"
Next in thread: Hubert Mania: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem"
Reply: Hubert Mania: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem"
Maybe reply: Andrew Clough: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem"
Maybe reply: hal@finney.org: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Damien Broderick wrote:

> Each of them protected by a force field and ray guns, to keep the next
> lot of terrorist-hijacked planes at bay.

Actually, nuke plants with a containment are claimed to be engineered to
withstand the impact of a crashing plane.

Next message: Sean Kenny: "RE: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thought problem"
Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: 1e6 advantage to the terrorists"
In reply to: Damien Broderick: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thought problem"
Next in thread: Hubert Mania: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem"
Reply: Hubert Mania: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem"
Maybe reply: Andrew Clough: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem"
Maybe reply: hal@finney.org: "Re: Energy and "the Clash of Civilizations" -- a policy thoughtproblem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:11:02 MST