Re: Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense.

From: Spike Jones (spike66@attglobal.net)
Date: Tue Aug 28 2001 - 09:06:54 MDT

• Next message: Mitchell, Jerry (3337): "RE: Paying for Schools (was: SOCIETY: Re: The privatization of pu blic security)"
• Previous message: Loree Thomas: "RE: Nominalism"
• In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
• Next in thread: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
• Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

"Michael M. Butler" wrote:

> But if somebody takes out (say) downtown San Jose, CA, and I am living
> 20 miles away, then hell, yes, a shelter is some use to me...

Waaaaait a minute. *Any* hypothetical nuclear attack must target
*Seattle* not San Jose! spike

• Next message: Mitchell, Jerry (3337): "RE: Paying for Schools (was: SOCIETY: Re: The privatization of pu blic security)"
• Previous message: Loree Thomas: "RE: Nominalism"
• In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
• Next in thread: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
• Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Shelters "of no use"?, was Re: Media ignores Ballistic Missile defense."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:10:10 MST