From: hibbert@netcom.com
Date: Wed Aug 22 2001 - 10:50:18 MDT
pcm@rahul.net said:
> I would say there's at least a 5% chance that one or more of those
> reports represents actual alien contact.
Wow! That seems amazingly high to me. Following Robin's precepts, you
must have seen some evidence that I missed. What collection of alien
contact reports have enough plausible details to make you go that high?
I must admit that I haven't studied the issue, and so have only been
exposed to third- and fourth-hand accounts of what has appeared in the
Enquirer since I read one of Von Daniken's books in high school.
And in case I missed something earlier in the conversation, is there some
specific referent to "those reports", or is it a generic for all the
popularly-known reports lumped together?
Chris
---
C. J. Cherryh, "Invader", on why we visit very old buildings:
"A sense of age, of profound truths. Respect for
Chris Hibbert something hands made, that's stood through storms and
hibbert@netcom.com wars and time. It persuades us that things we do may
last and matter."
http://discuss.foresight.org/~hibbert/home.html
Yahoo Instant Message: ag_cth
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:09:59 MST