RE: the prospect of immortality being taken seriously

From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 21:45:01 MDT


Damien writes

>> I don't know anything about Lord W. but I'd assume he and
>> most of the other "peers" he is talking about are 1-2 std.
>> deviations above average intelligence. People like Michael
>> and Eric are 3-4 std. deviations above average intelligence
>
> you Yanks would have a reciprocal clue as well. Sorry about that.
> Professor Lord Robert Winston is a major *in vitro* pioneer, with
> patents in transgenic technology, and the author and/or host of
> SUPERHUMAN (hasn't that reached PBS yet?), so he's not necessarily
> an Olde Fogey Farte of marginal intelligence.

:-) I'm sure that Robert was not implying by any means that Lord W.
is of "marginal intelligence". I have talked to Eric Drexler and
I have the same impression that Robert does. Eric is close to 4
standard deviations, I'd guess. (That's about 1 in 30,000 statistically,
although I don't know about "actually"; perhaps your encyclopedia would
say again.)

Have you had an opportunity to talk to Lord W. for more than just a
few minutes? I would be very interested in your personal impressions.
While I'm sure that there are some very interesting exceptions, I
find that I can get a pretty good idea of someone's intelligence
after a ten or twenty minute discussion with them. At least for
sure I've met some pretty dumb customers with Ph.D.'s (I even
went to high school with some).

Lee



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:09:57 MST