RE: [isml] Re: Scientists outflanked and outgunned in cloning debate(fwd)

From: Barbara Lamar (altamiratexas@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Aug 03 2001 - 20:17:45 MDT


 Russell Blackford wrote:

> I await the attitude of the US
> Senate to the proposed theocratic anti-cloning law.

FWIW, my friend who works for Ron Paul in D.C. says they're expecting the
bill to have a much more difficult time in the Senate. Again, I urge all US
voters to make phone calls to your Senator.

> Some of the anti-tech arguments will not simply be theocratic
> bullshit and
> will make sense. We need to deal with this patiently.

Absolutely. I'm always distressed by the cavalier way many Extropians treat
conservation and environmental issues.

>We need people who can reconcile
> transhumanism with the views of those who have "spiritual"
> yearnings, while
> sounding (again) very calm and reasonable (Samantha?).

Yes. In order to successfully communicate, one must speak in a language the
audience can understand.

I think it would also be useful to distinguish between issues that have no
relevance to transhumanism, and those which are crucial. Some political
issues--racism, for example--are crucial (if anyone on the list doesn't
agree, please say so, and I'll explain my reasoning). Others--whether or not
an ideal society should have corporations, for example--may be interesting,
but they don't warrant heated arguments.

Barbara



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:09:26 MST