Re: Quantum Jumpers

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Mon Jun 11 2001 - 23:06:26 MDT


John Clark wrote:
>
> I always thought it odd that people use the term "quantum jump" to mean
> a huge transformation of some sort when actually a quantum jump is the
> tinniest possible physical change. Anything less and there is no change
> at all.

I suspect that it derives from the contrast of an instantaneous,
not-over-the-intervening-space transition to a continuous movement. It's
not how large the jump is, but how fast it is, or rather how fast it
appears. Heck, a change in electron orbital levels is pretty large if you
measure it in Planck increments.

Or people just hear "quantum leap" and think it sounds cool.

-- -- -- -- --
Eliezer S. Yudkowsky http://singinst.org/
Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:08:04 MST