From: Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Mon May 14 2001 - 07:31:19 MDT
______________________________________________________________
ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 09:19:07 -0400
From: David Farber <dave@farber.net>
Reply-To: farber@cis.upenn.edu
To: ip-sub-1@majordomo.pobox.com
Subject: IP: Douglas Adams [1952 -2001];LAMENT FOR DOUGLAS by R. Dawkins
>Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 01:45:11 -0400
>To: 3culture@edge.org (Third Culture Mail List)
>From: John Brockman <brockman@edge.org>
>
>
>"Nobody knows, and you can't find out."
>
>Edge 85 - May 14, 2001
>
>http://www.edge.org
>
>(1550 words)
>
>------------------------
>THE THIRD CULTURE
>------------------------
>
>Douglas Adams
>[1952 - 2001]
>
>[Image: "The Digital Planet": Douglas Adams at the Muffathalle in Munich,
>November, 1998]
>
>LAMENT FOR DOUGLAS
>By Richard Dawkins
>
>This is not an obituary, there'll be time enough for them. It is not a
>tribute, not a considered assessment of a brilliant life, not a eulogy. It
>is a keening lament, written too soon to be balanced, too soon to be
>carefully thought through. Douglas, you cannot be dead.
>
>------------------------
>------------------------
>
>THE THIRD CULTURE
>
>------------------------
>Douglas Adams
>[1952 - 2001]
>
>LAMENT FOR DOUGLAS
>By Richard Dawkins
>
>[Image: "The Digital Planet": Douglas Adams at the Muffathalle in Munich,
>November, 1998]
>
>This is not an obituary, there'll be time enough for them. It is not a
>tribute, not a considered assessment of a brilliant life, not a eulogy. It
>is a keening lament, written too soon to be balanced, too soon to be
>carefully thought through. Douglas, you cannot be dead.
>
>A sunny Saturday morning in May, ten past seven, shuffle out of bed, log
>in to e-mail as usual. The usual blue bold headings drop into place,
>mostly junk, some expected, and my gaze absently follows them down the
>page. The name Douglas Adams catches my eye and I smile. That one, at
>least, will be good for a laugh. Then I do the classic double-take, back
>up the screen. WHAT did that heading actually say? DOUGLAS ADAMS DIED OF A
>HEART ATTACK A FEW HOURS AGO. Then that other cliché, the words swelling
>before my eyes. It must be part of the joke. It must be some other Douglas
>Adams. This is too ridiculous to be true. I must still be asleep. I open
>the message, from a well-known German software designer. It is no joke, I
>am fully awake. And it is the right - or rather the wrong - Douglas Adams.
>A sudden heart attack, in the gym in Santa Barbara. "Man, man, man, man oh
>man," the message concludes,
>
>Man indeed, what a man. A giant of a man, surely nearer seven foot than
>six, broad-shouldered, and he did not stoop like some very tall men who
>feel uncomfortable with their height. But nor did he swagger with the
>macho assertiveness that can be intimidating in a big man. He neither
>apologised for his height, nor flaunted it. It was part of the joke
>against himself.
>
>One of the great wits of our age, his sophisticated humour was founded in
>a deep, amalgamated knowledge of literature and science, two of my great
>loves. And he introduced me to my wife - at his fortieth birthday party.
>He was exactly her age, they had worked together on Dr Who. Should I tell
>her now, or let her sleep a bit longer before shattering her day? He
>initiated our togetherness and was a recurrently important part of it. I
>must tell her now.
>
>Douglas and I met because I sent him an unsolicited fan letter - I think
>it is the only time I have ever written one. I had adored THE HITCHHIKER'S
>GUIDE TO THE GALAXY. Then I read DIRK GENTLY'S HOLISTIC DETECTIVE AGENCY.
>As soon as I finished it I turned back to page one and read it straight
>through again - the only I time I have ever done that, and I wrote to tell
>him so. He replied that he was a fan of my books, and he invited me to his
>house in London. I have seldom met a more congenial spirit. Obviously I
>knew he would be funny. What I didn't know was how deeply read he was in
>science. I should have guessed, for you can't understand many of the jokes
>in HITCHHIKER if you don't know a lot of advanced science. And in modern
>electronic technology he was a real expert. We talked science a lot, in
>private, and even in public at literary festivals and on the wireless or
>television. And he became my guru on all technical problems. Rather than
>struggle with some ill-written and incomprehensible manual in Pacific Rim
>English, I would fire off an e-mail to Douglas. He would reply, often
>within minutes, whether in London or Santa Barbara, or some hotel room
>anywhere in the world. Unlike most staffers of professional help lines,
>Douglas understood EXACTLY my problem, knew EXACTLY why it was troubling
>me, and always had the solution ready, lucidly and amusingly explained.
>Our frequent e-mail exchanges brimmed with literary and scientific jokes
>and affectionately sardonic little asides. His technophilia shone through,
>but so did his rich sense of the absurd. The whole world was one big Monty
>Python sketch, and the follies of humanity are as comic in the world's
>silicon valleys as anywhere else.
>
>He laughed at himself with equal good humour. At, for example, his epic
>bouts of writer's block ("I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise
>they make as they go by") when, according to legend, his publisher and
>book agent would literally lock him in a hotel room, with no telephone,
>and nothing to do but write, releasing him only for supervised walks. If
>his enthusiasm ran away with him and he advanced a biological theory too
>eccentric for my professional scepticism to let pass, his mien at my
>dismissal of it would always be more humorously self-mocking than
>genuinely crestfallen. And he would have another go.
>
>He laughed at his own jokes, which good comedians are supposed not to, but
>he did it with such charm that the jokes became even funnier. He was
>gently able to poke fun without wounding, and it would be aimed not at
>individuals but at their absurd ideas. To illustrate the vain conceit that
>the universe must be somehow pre-ordained for us, because we are so
>well-suited to live in it, he mimed a wonderfully funny imitation of a
>puddle of water, fitting itself snugly into a depression in the ground,
>THE DEPRESSION UNCANNILY BEING EXACTLY THE SAME SHAPE AS THE PUDDLE. Or
>there's this parable, which he told with huge enjoyment, whose moral leaps
>out with no further explanation. A man didn't understand how televisions
>work, and was convinced that there must be lots of little men inside the
>box. manipulating images at high speed. An engineer explained to him about
>high frequency modulations of the electromagnetic spectrum, about
>transmitters and receivers, about amplifiers and cathode ray tubes, about
>scan lines moving across and down a phosphorescent screen. The man
>listened to the engineer with careful attention, nodding his head at every
>step of the argument. At the end he pronounced himself satisfied. He
>really did now understand how televisions work. "But I expect there are
>just a few little men in there, aren't there?"
>
>Science has lost a friend, literature has lost a luminary, the mountain
>gorilla and the black rhino have lost a gallant defender (he once climbed
>Kilimanjaro in a rhino suit to raise money to fight the cretinous trade in
>rhino horn), Apple Computer has lost its most eloquent apologist. And I
>have lost an irreplaceable intellectual companion and one of the kindest
>and funniest men I ever met. I officially received a happy piece of news
>yesterday, which would have delighted him. I wasn't allowed to tell anyone
>during the weeks I have secretly known about it, and now that I am allowed
>to it is too late.
>
>[Image:Richard Dawkins, Daniel C. Dennett, Douglas Adams, Jared Diamond,
>Steven Pinker]
>
>The sun is shining, life must go on, seize the day and all those clichés.
>We shall plant a tree this very day: a Douglas Fir, tall, upright,
>evergreen. It is the wrong time of year, but we'll give it our best shot.
>Off to the arboretum.
>
> -----
>
>The tree is planted, and this article completed, all within 24 hours of
>his death. Was it cathartic? No, but it was worth a try.
>
>
>---
>
>It was announced today that RICHARD DAWKINS has been elected a Fellow of
>the Royal Society. Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist and the Charles
>Simonyi Professor For The Understanding Of Science at Oxford University;
>Fellow of New College; author of THE SELFISH GENE,THE EXTENDED
>PHENOTYPE,THE BLIND WATCHMAKER, RIVER OUT OF EDEN (Science Masters
>Series), CLIMBING MOUNT IMPROBABLE, AND UNWEAVING THE RAINBOW.
>
>[Also appearing today in THE GUARDIAN and FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG.]
>
>------------------------
>------------------------
>EDGE
>John Brockman, Editor and Publisher
>
>Copyright © 2001 by Edge Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>
>Published by Edge Foundation, Inc., 5 East 59th Street, New York, NY 10022
>
>[If at any time you want your name to be taken off this mail list, please
>let us know.]
>------------------------
>------------------------
>
>--
>"...deliciously creative... the variety astonishes. Edge continues to
>launch intellectual skyrockets of stunning brilliance. Nobody in the world
>is doing what Edge is doing." ARTS & LETTERS DAILY
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>John Brockman
>
>HONG KONG: MAY 18-22
>BEIJING: MAY 22-26
>SHANGHAI: MAY 26-31
>Mobile: 011-44-385-354-563
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>President brockman@edge.org
>Edge Foundation, Inc. tel: 212.355-1999
>5 East 59th Street fax: 212.935.5535
>New York, NY 10022
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:07:39 MST