From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Tue May 01 2001 - 10:16:46 MDT
In a message dated 5/1/2001 5:30:11 AM Eastern Daylight Time, asa@nada.kth.se
writes:
<< At least it is falsifiable.
Hmm, topological theology - the science of what gods and moral systems
are possible in spacetimes of different topology. "Oh, this is a
non-orientable universe, so dualism is not consistent. But the genus is
sufficiently negative to enable deontological ethics, at least in a
linearized sense." >>
Falsifiability. What if we live in an age where we neither have them means
nor the concepts right to be able to falsify, at least hypothetically, a
'test' for said theory. Could the best scientists of 1832 have been able to
flasify the neutrino? I am guessing no, and the smartest people wouldn't have
been interested in such an activity.
Mitch (hey! I just shit-canned popper!)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:07:24 MST