what is the transaction? Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?

From: Andy Toth (antst20+@pitt.edu)
Date: Sun Apr 01 2001 - 14:37:06 MDT

• Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?"
• Previous message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?"
• In reply to: Anders Sandberg: "Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?"
• Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

are the smallest (infinite) chemical transactions* digital?

i think they are. i have no literal support.

* energy change in infinitely small degree

• Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?"
• Previous message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?"
• In reply to: Anders Sandberg: "Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?"
• Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "Re: "analog computer" = useless hypothesis?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:06:48 MST