From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sun Feb 11 2001 - 11:45:37 MST
> Thanks for your input, but as I said in another post, I was being
flippant here in
> response to what I perceived to be a misuse of the term. I really do
understand what
> human nature refers to from a scientific point of view, which is why it
bothers me
> when it is used too generally. I apologize for being too cryptic. :-)
>
> --Neal
In short, it is not a colon cancer gene but a gene that affects our
ability to respond to the environment. And that, says Venter, is what
human nature is all about.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4134598,00.html
τΏτ
Stay hungry,
--J. R.
Useless hypotheses: consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind,
free will
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:05:46 MST