Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now

From: tilley@att.net
Date: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:12:37 MST

• Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Cloning Humans"
• Previous message: Amara Graps: "Starlab??"
• Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
• Next in thread: Brian D Williams: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

it would depend on which one of us is the 220 year old
22-year-old.
dontcha think?
> At 7:20 PM +0000 1/16/01, Russell Whitaker wrote:
> >It's encouraging that you're taking the time to respond
> >to statements forwarded to this list, so thanks, but...
> >all I'm asking of you is to disambiguate your statement
> >above, to assure that the inevitable disagreements
> >with it are disagreements with your _actual_ position.
>
> What might be the difference between a 22 year old 22-year-old and a
> 220 year old 22-year-old?
>

• Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Cloning Humans"
• Previous message: Amara Graps: "Starlab??"
• Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
• Next in thread: Brian D Williams: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:04:56 MST