From: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 13:30:16 MST
Spudboy100@aol.com wrote:
> More modest laser defense technology seems now more plausible.
I beg to disagree. Destroying a missile in the boost phase (while it
still has fuel and the warhead/decoys are still in one piece) with
a directed energy weapon is no small picknick. Missiles are cheap,
airborne lasers are not.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:04:54 MST