Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields,..
From: John Clark (jonkc@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Fri Jan 12 2001 - 09:03:19 MST
- Next message: John Clark: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Previous message: GBurch1@aol.com: "META: Some Thoughts on List Governance"
- In reply to: John Marlow: "Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Next in thread: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields,.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields,.."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
John Marlow <johnmarrek@yahoo.com> Wrote:
>Handing all of the major hardware to a single, INHUMAN
>party is insanity.
It's unlikely anyone will do so, however when a super intelligent machine
is ready to take over it will not need to ask anybody's permission, it will
just do so, nobody could stop it. it might be nice to us, it might not.
>Anything purely logical would
be impossible.
>Anything emotional is itself unpredictable and dangerous.
Well certainly. But I don't remember anyone guaranteeing that the singularity
would be fun.
>Marlow's Paradox
Perhaps I'm missing something but, where is the paradox?
John K Clark jonkc@att.net
- Next message: John Clark: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Previous message: GBurch1@aol.com: "META: Some Thoughts on List Governance"
- In reply to: John Marlow: "Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Next in thread: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields,.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields,.."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:04:48 MST