Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc..
From: Michael M. Butler (butler@comp-lib.org)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 21:51:25 MST
- Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Previous message: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- In reply to: John Marlow: "Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
And since humans are meat machines, we can't trust humans. QED.
Nothing new under the sun.
John Marlow wrote:
>
> Okay, call me self-aggrandizing, but this has for some
> time been my take on entrusting our fates to machines:
>
> Marlow's Paradox:
>
> “We cannot entrust our fate to machines without
> emotions, for they have no compassion; we cannot
> entrust our fate to machines with emotions, for they
> are unpredictable.”
>
> Basically, we can't trust machines.
- Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Previous message: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- In reply to: John Marlow: "Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:04:47 MST