Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc..
From: Michael M. Butler (butler@comp-lib.org)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 21:56:25 MST
- Next message: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Previous message: John Marlow: "Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- In reply to: John Marlow: "Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
Additional thought:
You are right that "who do you trust?" becomes ever more important as
power concentrates. As I never tire of repeating, even something as
rudimentary as Axelrod's _The Evolution of Cooperation_
(http://pscs.physics.lsa.umich.edu/Software/CC/ECHome.html if you're
lazy) points out that rough parity between players is essential for
cooperation to be a successful, evolutionarily stable strategy.
John Marlow wrote:
>
> Okay, call me self-aggrandizing,
- Next message: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Previous message: John Marlow: "Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- In reply to: John Marlow: "Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Maybe reply: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:04:47 MST