Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Tue Jan 02 2001 - 18:37:51 MST

Next message: Emlyn: "Re: SPACE: Death of the "indie" bossters"
Previous message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Thanks all, was Re: Bacteria question."
In reply to: zeb haradon: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Next in thread: Steve Nichols: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

From: "zeb haradon" <zebharadon@hotmail.com>
Spend
> some time doing it, and you'll find what is meant by "philosophy".
You'll
> see that some of it is valid and some is not.

When younger, I used to love to read philosophy, but I've already wasted
too much time with it. Never mind... the Singularity will make short
shrift of this silliness we call "philosophy."

Muaahahahahahahahahahahehe...

Stay hungry,

--J. R.
3M TA3

=====================
Useless hypotheses: consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind,
free will

Next message: Emlyn: "Re: SPACE: Death of the "indie" bossters"
Previous message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Thanks all, was Re: Bacteria question."
In reply to: zeb haradon: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Next in thread: Steve Nichols: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:04:28 MST