Re: POL: United States

From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Thu Dec 21 2000 - 10:05:39 MST

• Next message: Dan Fabulich: "Re: Majors was: Nanotech"
• Previous message: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Clarification and limited apology"
• In reply to: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: POL: United States"
• Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: POL: United States"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> > http://www.flagday.com/history/hornswoggled/index.shtml
>
>Well, I can say one reason why the military one is flown: the civil one
>looks like crap.

I agree. I call it the "anti-flag". It seems to be the opposite of
what we are used to. Vertical stripes instead of horizontal. Blue
stars on a white field instead of white stars on a blue field. It's
pretty bizarre looking.

-- 
Harvey Newstrom <HarveyNewstrom.com>

• Next message: Dan Fabulich: "Re: Majors was: Nanotech"
• Previous message: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Clarification and limited apology"
• In reply to: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: POL: United States"
• Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: POL: United States"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:32:30 MST